Saturday, January 22, 2011

...no justification for abortion is necessary.

On this anniversary of the day the Law of the Land said murdering the innocent is legal, I am reminded of Greg Koukl's (www.str.org) simple summary of the question at hand:

"If the unborn is not a human person, no justification for abortion is necessary. However, if the unborn is a human person, no justification for abortion is adequate."

This properly sums up the debate. If the unborn is simply a blob of cells, who cares if we kill it?

That forces the question: "Is the unborn a human person?"

Well, last time I checked, traveling 6 inches down a birth canal had no transforming effect changing something from one type of entity to another. And based on what was removed in these instances (http://bit.ly/eh5tJm), it seems safe to conclude that the unborn is a human person.

Call me crazy, but the logic seems to speak for itself:

Premise: If the unborn is a human person, no justification for abortion is adequate.

Observation: The unborn appears to be a human person (based on what is removed) and based on science (http://www.sfuhl.org/)

Conclusion: There is no adequate justification for abortion.

The end. Or don't we wish.

Pray for those involved in this culture of death. Pray for life.

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.5

No comments:

Post a Comment